Life At Sullivan Header-1

Two from Sullivan Profiled in BC Law Magazine

Posted by Ojen Sirin on Aug 12, 2021 4:00:00 PM
Find me on:

Chinyere Okogeri and Nick O'Donnell are among the alumni covered in Boston College Law Magazine's Summer Issue.

Chinyere Okogeri

Chinyere (pronounced "Chin-year-e") was one of Sullivan's 2020 Summer Associates and will be an incoming First Year Associate this fall. In the article Hear Her Voice, Chinyere discusses what led her to choose law school and what motivates her in being the best advocate she can be:

I’m motivated to do what I do by family and the people I have had the privilege to work for. We often talk about privilege as characterized by race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, body type, and more. But privilege is actually opportunity, and not everyone has opportunity. I am still constantly learning from others and checking my own biases because we all can be better allies and advocates for the communities we have the privilege to serve and support.

Chinyere's full article can be accessed here.

Nicholas O'Donnell

Nick is a partner in our Litigation department and also leads Sullivan's Art & Museum Law Group. His article Looted: A Saga of Nazi-Stolen Art summarizes the international battle over the Guelph Treasure theft. After a lengthy and ultimately unsuccessful legal battle in Europe, the heirs of the original owners retained Nick, who subsequently filed suit for restitution of $250 million in federal court in D.C. The case presented considerable jurisdictional challenges. Nick prevailed at the district and appellate levels, arguing that the forced sale of the Guelph Treasure was part of the Nazis' genocidal project against the Jewish people, thus satisfying the "in violation of international law" exception to the principle of sovereign immunity.

N. ODonnell SCOTUS argument 1The case eventually made its way to the US Supreme Court in December of last year, with Nick presenting his oral argument over the phone due to the pandemic. Unfortunately, the Court ultimately held that US courts do not have jurisdiction over cases involving a foreign government's taking of the property of its own nationals, the rise of international human rights law and the law of genocide notwithstanding.

The  Supreme Court did agree with our clients’ argument that takings of art are covered by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The court remanded the matter for further proceedings concerning whether the victims were German nationals, and whether the present-day Plaintiffs may now argue that their ancestors were not German nationals

Nick's full article can be accessed here.


Sullivan 4c

About the Blog

Life at Sullivan  provides a snapshot of Sullivan culture — your chance to meet some of our attorneys and discover what it's like to work here.

The material on this site is for general information only and is not legal advice. No liability is accepted for any loss or damage which may result from reliance on it. Always consult a qualified lawyer about a specific legal problem.


Upcoming Events

Subscribe to Blog

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic